Are either of these statements the official policy statement of the UCD?
No.
The UCD itself has formally remained silent, like so many other golpista parts of Honduran civil society,
ANDI and COHEP each said last Sunday that they would make formal statements last Monday, yet, if they've made them, no one has seen fit to cover them. The Catholic Church, through a spokesperson, said last Sunday that it would need a day to analyze the document. It spoke out late Monday in favor of the accord.
Nonetheless, when the UCD does formally speak, if ever, it probably will sound a lot like what Dacaret and Anduray had to say.
Dacaret, speaking to Tiempo on Sunday, said
"The politicians continue to play with the law, with this Accord - although they say its based on the constitution - it disrespects it completely."
Dacaret, however,failed to cite any examples of this disrespect. He predicted that Lobo Sosa and Juan Orlando Hernandez would find themselves in a fight with Manuel Zelaya Rosales.
Fernando Anduray is another often heard voice of the UCD. In Wednesday's La Tribuna, he said the Cartagena Accord has a hidden agenda.
"We are preoccupied by the things that we don't see of the Accord that was signed; on the one hand, we have a call to a National Constituent Assembly, but disguised in the form of constitutionalism and it does not say the time in which these situations will happen."
Anduray goes on to launch an attack on Lobo Sosa:
"There's a hidden agenda; this has been the permanent conduct of President Porfirio Lobo Sosa, who has never told the Honduran people the truth and the things which are behind [this]; here, nonetheless, is behind the participation of Honduras in this famous society of nations the Hugo Chavez wants to form."
Anduray sees all of this as a plot in which Manuel Zelaya Rosales and the FNRP are political instruments for those who seek macroeconomic control for the next twelve years.
The UCD does not like anything that Manuel Zelaya Rosales or Hugo Chavez are part of. Lobo Sosa is being tarred with that brush for having agreed to the Chavez - Santos mediation that resulted in the Cartagena Accord, and for saying that a plebiscite is the way to begin the road to convene a National Constituent Convention.
So from a fair proxy for the extreme right of Honduran society, we would have to say the Cartagena Accord has gotten a pretty thorough rejection, and Porfirio Lobo Sosa along with it.
It will be interesting to compare the responses of Bishop Juan José Pineda of Tegucigalpa, very much tied to the powers that be, with those of Bishop Luis Alfonso Santos who is sympathetic to the Resistance.
ReplyDeleteJust a note that there has been no official Catholic statement (which would probably have to be made by the Bishops Conference.)Neither Bishop Pineda nor Father Miguel Angel Pastor are spokespersons for the whole Catholic church of Honduras. At most they would be speaking for the Tegucigalpa archdiocese.
Good point. Conflating the opinion of Pineda, the Auxillary Bishop of the Archdiocese with that of the whole church is wrong. I need to pay more attention to who is speaking and who they speak for in the church.
ReplyDelete