tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1338612245455097792.post1011584887950453321..comments2023-09-11T10:45:49.957-07:00Comments on Honduras Culture and Politics: Contextualizing the Roland Valenzuela interview: Congress and Ambassador Llorens, June 22-28, 2009RAJhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00097415587406899236noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1338612245455097792.post-87690684421485568602010-07-06T05:05:19.534-07:002010-07-06T05:05:19.534-07:00Can I say that by comparison and finding historica...Can I say that by comparison and finding historical analogy that Llorens had seen the documents?<br />It happened before in Egypt that there was communications between the officers who were conspiring to overthrow the King and the American ambassador in Cairo.<br />he was the famous (or infamous Jefferson Caffery)Ossamahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01481256740800429421noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1338612245455097792.post-5139897890736436112010-07-05T10:31:56.505-07:002010-07-05T10:31:56.505-07:00I agree that until the actual documents are availa...I agree that until the actual documents are available, understanding who saw them will be quite impossible. Annotations on the documents will be of great interest.RAJhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00097415587406899236noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1338612245455097792.post-5213188803210976462010-07-05T10:03:15.451-07:002010-07-05T10:03:15.451-07:00The interview refers to what I think are marginali...The interview refers to what I think are marginalia. If so, that could answer the question of who at the embassy saw and read the document. But they could also refer to handwritten comments made by someone in the Congress or even typed comments in the original ala <i>not enough proof. Need more.</i>Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com