The Death of Culture

Honduras no longer has a Secretary of State in Culture, Art, and Sports. The carcass that the last two mismanaging Ministers of Culture left will be picked over for the bits that the Hernández government feels are effective and can be used to further its goals and missions, and the rest will be dumped.

It's not that this comes as a complete surprise.

We've been vocal about the rampant neglect of the last two Culture ministers under the Lobo Sosa administration. There was the one with the strange notion of what culture is, and the one for whom culture is to sponsor street fairs at which folk dancing and his beloved chess are taught.  Both let the ministry stagnate, and become irrelevant.

So when Jorge Ramon Hernandez Alcerro announced today that it would disappear, along with the Secretariates of Justice and Human Rights, Tourism, and Planning, few should have been surprised. 

The Hernández administration chose to model their government re-organization after the reorganization carried out by Rafael Correa in Ecuador.

But Ecuador still has a Ministry of Culture.  Honduras will not.

In not having a cabinet-level Minister of Culture, Honduras will become unique in Latin America.

In some countries this role is combined with the Ministry of Education; in others it is a stand alone Ministry; in still others it's paired with Tourism; but everyone else has one.

Not Honduras; not any more.

Hernandez Alcerro tells us not to worry about the abolished ministries, because this does not mean that their missions and functions necessarily will be going away.

Each will be picked apart, broken up, and the parts deemed effective will continue.  But they will be assigned to a lower level, headed by non-cabinet functionaries within the new super ministries.

The breakup of Culture will be the responsibility of Alden Rivera, Minister of Competitiveness and Employment, the place that the functions of this former ministry have been assigned in the new cabinet structure.

This decision will be even more consequential than the demotion in level of administration in changing the role of the remaining entities forming part of the former ministry of culture-- including the Instituto Hondureño de Antropología e Historia.

Rivera has said he has 21 institutions assigned to his ministry, and he will be reducing them to twelve over the next several weeks. Some, like Tourism, will become Institutes.

The mission of all twelve of the surviving institutions, according to Rivera, will be to

serve the Nation in terms of economic services and to stimulate the labor of the businesses and entrepreneurs to have a transforming effect for the country.

This mission is a far cry from the role of the now dissolved ministry, which during its earlier history worked to increase the appreciation of the Honduran people for their own history and culture, and supported non-governmental institutions and efforts to preserve, develop, and share knowledge about those topics nationally and internationally.

It is that role that has made cabinet-level offices of culture universal in Latin America.

But not in Honduras, now.

The Shape of the New Honduran Government

The Honduran government under Juan Orlando Hernández is on a slimming diet that hopes to save 4000 million lempiras (about $190 million). 

It will accomplish this slimming by radically restructuring the government and its bureaucracy.  As a first step, Honduras has already gone from having 38 cabinet level Ministers, to having only seven.  There will be a total of twelve Subsecretaries, all of them reporting to one of the seven ministers.

Here's the seven ministries, and what existing government institutions will be preserved under them:

0.  Executive Branch Administration (no official name announced)
          Minister - Reinaldo Sanchez
          Advisor - Ebal Diaz
          Communications and Strategy - Hilda Hernandez
          Coordinator - Jorge Ramon Hernandez Alcerro

*1.  Gabinete de Competitividad y Empleo  (Competiveness and Employment)
          Minister - Alden Rivera
          S. de Trabajo - Carlos Alberto Madero Erazo
          S. de Desarrollo Economico - Jorge Lobo
          SERNA (Secretaria de Recursos Naturales) - José Antonio Galdámez

*2. Gabinete de Economia y Finanzas (Economy and Finances)
          Minister - Wilfredo Cerrato
          BCH (Banco Central de Honduras) - Marlon Tabora
          DEI (equivalent of the IRS) - Miriam Guzman

*3.  Gabinete de Energia e Infraestructura (Energy and Infrastructure)
          Minister - Roberto Ordoñez
          SOPTRAVI (Secretaria de Obras Publicas) - Roberto Ordoñez

*4.  Gabinete de Gobernabilidad y Modernización (Government and Modernization)
          Minister - Ricardo Alvarez
          S. de Interior y Poblacion - Rigoberto Chang Castillo

*5.  Gabinete de Inclusion y Desarrollo Social (Participation and Social Development)
          Minister - Lisandro Rosales
          S. de Salud - Yolany Batres
          S. de Educación - Marlon Escoto

*6.  Gabinete de Seguridad (Security)
          Minister - Arturo Corrales
          Vice Minister - Alejandra Hernandez
          S. de Seguridad - Arturo Corrales
          S. de Defensa - Samuel Reyes

7.  Gabinete de Relaciones Exteriores
          Minister - Mireya Aguero de Corrales


While a lot of decisions remain to be made, the following Secretaries of State are abolished:

1. Secretaria de Cultura, Artes y Deportes
2. Secretaria de Planificacion y Cooperacion Externa
3. Secretaria de Turismo
4. Secretaria de Justicia y Derechos Humanos
5. Secretaria de Pueblos Indigenas y Afrodescendientes
6. Secretaria de la Juventud

"Abolished" here means that these are no longer Secretarias de Estado, cabinet-level offices. It is not that their functions will necessarily go away.

Those functions will be evaluated. Jorge Ramon Hernandez Alcerro, the Coordinator in the Presidential Ministry, has the responsibility for keeping each Ministry to its assigned goals, and for determining by Tuesday, February 4, how the functions of each secretaria that is not being continued get integrated into the existing structure.

As a hint at what may happen: Alden Rivera has explained that in his Ministry,  Competitividad y Empleo,  there are currently twenty-one institutions and those will be reduced to twelve.

 So stay tuned.  There will be more changes.

Why did the US reject three Honduran consuls?

The Spanish news agency EFE reports that the Honduran consuls of Los Angeles, Atlanta and San Francisco, Vivian Panting, Cecilia Callejas and Francisco Venegas, were refused accreditation by the US, for staying in their posts under the de facto regime after the coup d'Etat.

EFE cites vice minister Alden Rivera as saying the three "received a request that they change their migration status or leave the country within 30 days" during the de facto regime, to which they did not respond. EFE notes that as the US did not recognize the Micheletti regime, it considered the consulates closed, and thus, these individuals could no longer stay in the US as diplomats.

Honduran newspapers are covering the story somewhat differently.

El Heraldo leads with the dedication of Foreign Minister Mario Canahuati to personally denounce any "irregularity" detected in any of the US consulates. According to their story, the reason for the removal of the three officials was that they were doing personal business on the side.

Quoting vice-minister Alden Rivera, the story says that the US State Department has "begun to execute a new mechanism of evaluation to avoid diplomats of Honduras accredited in the US carrying out activities different from those of their functions". Proceso Digital emphasizes the same point, again quoting Alden Rivera: the US "is not going to permit in any case that a functionary would be accredited in a consulate and that he would not give services in that Consulate or that they dedicate themselves to another activity such as study, work, or conduct business".

This may well be true. But it is not clear that it has anything to do with these specific dismissals.

Buried deep in the Heraldo story, Foreign Minister Canahuati is quoted as saying

"I have said that I am going to share information about the way the diplomats are conducting themselves but at this moment I don't have any complaint, what has happened is that there are some functionaries that were renewed but the government of the United States does not want to accredit them because they simply adduce that they were working in the time of the Micheletti administration..."

"They will logically be removed from their positions but they simply were not accredited by the US, not for undue actions or incompletion of their duties."

Confused? you should be. Were the consuls in question conducting business on the side, not completing their duties, or acting as consuls for an unrecognized regime? You pick.

But wait, there's more!

Honduran congress member Marcia Facussé contradicts Mario Canahuati's explanation, arguing that these people cannot be tainted by associations with Micheletti because the US never recognized any Micheletti-appointed diplomats.

She has a point; however, it is a slippery one. And as an avid supporter of the coup, she is motivated to defend the regime it installed and not face up to the fact that this is another piece of collateral damage.

During the de facto regime, some Honduran diplomats went over to the side of Micheletti, so it is perfectly possible for there to be a diplomat from before the coup who nonetheless is unacceptable to the US now because of association with the Micheletti regime.

In a sense, the coup was a test for all the officials of the Zelaya government, and despite the fact that it created a horrific double-bind, when the consuls received notices from the US that their immigration status had changed, they had two choices. Not acting was not one of them.