A criminal gang of Police in Honduras have continued to serve since 2003 when they're names became known in an investigation about a group running guns to the FARC in Colombia. Several are now or have been high ranking Police executives.
On July 6, 2003, then Congress person Armando Avila Panchamé was arrested while fleeing the crash of a drug trafficking airplane in Olancho. The plane had landed on the ranch of Ramon Matta, son of the Honduran drug lord with the same name who was arrested and extradited illegally to the US in 1998. Panchamé was arrested along with 10 others. The vehicle he was driving had attracted police interest because it had been seen a few months earlier near Arenal, Yoro, at the scene of another drug plane crash. After his arrest, Panchamé waived his immunity, and was tried and convicted and sentenced to 20 years in prison. He was shot to death by another prisoner in prison less than a year later.
Panchamé was the second National Party Congressperson in a month to be arrested for drug trafficking that year.
Also in 2003, Police officer Exequial Antonio Estrada Izaguirre sent a report to the head of the Police Investigative unit, Coralia Rivera de Coca, detailing the misbehavior of a number of his fellow officers in Monjaras, Choluteca. It seems Inspector Leonel Enrique Matute Chavez was stopped along the road there and his vehicle was found to contain more than a hundred weapons of various calibers to be sent to Rodrigo José Londono, in Colombia, to pass into the control of the FARC. The arms were being sent by Panchamé to a drug plane that was to land in Choluteca to exchange them for money.
This report listed their high level contacts in the police used by Panchamé: Ramirez del Cid, Napoleon Nazar, somebody Sauceda, somebody Sabillon, all of whom were present when the drug plane landed in Choluteca, so that nothing would go wrong if the Honduran police or DEA found out. These names should be familiar to you from previous posts about police involved in crime organizations. All of them have multiple accusations of criminal involvement in known cases in Honduras, yet all of them have continued to rise in the Police ranks.
A confidential US State Department memo at the time concludes that Avila Panchamé was "offered up" as a sacrificial lamb "in an effort to demonstrate to the US the GOH's commitment to combating drug trafficking and corruption at the highest levels" much as the Valle Valle and Rivera Maradiaga were for the current government.
The police investigation has remained open and there are entries in the file through 2016, but it remained buried in police files until this year, along with evidence that someone tried to have the files expunged during the last few years. Three of them became the Police Commissioners before retiring. Ten have been either removed through the Police cleanup process or suspended. Two more were caught in criminal situations and removed. But 15 of them remain active in the police.
News, commentary, and analysis of current events in Honduras where cultural forms intersect with political interests, with links to the work of Honduran writers and scholars.
Long Documents
▼
Monday, February 20, 2017
Saturday, February 18, 2017
UN Concerned New Criminal Code Violates Human Rights
President Juan Hernandez is urging the Honduran Congress to pass his package of reforms to the penal code, saying that opposition to them is just politics. Among those are changes to the law so that the Police and Military have immunity from being prosecuted for the use of force, and another change that criminalizes protests as terrorism. Needless to say the UN Office of the High Commissioner of Human Rights (OHCHR) has grave concerns about three of the changes.
First the OHCHR is concerned about changes to the definition of terrorism in Article 335 of the Codigo Penal. The changes adds to the paragraph on terrorism:
For those who haven't been paying attention, every Honduran government since the coup has asserted that protests such as the Torchlight Marches were violating the fundamental rights of the population because protesters blocked the streets. The change in the law criminalizes as terrorism protests against the government. The OHCHR agrees, and suggests that the law make a more narrow definition of terrorism:
The OHCHR also has concerns about the changes to Article 222 of the Penal Code referring to extortion. They point out the new law, as written, strengthens the penalty to 20 years to life in prison. This ignores the Honduran Supreme Court guidance that calls for a penalty that is proportional to the harm caused called for in their review of the proposed law. The Honduran Supreme Court also indicated in their review of this proposed change that it felt that increasing the penalty would not significantly serve as a deterrent to lower the incidence of extortion. Furthermore, the law defines extortion as terrorism, which for the OHCHR is just wrong. Extortion is never, per se, automatically an act of terrorism. Such an equation breaks the spirit and international norms in the struggle against terrorism. It significantly restricts the processual and penal guarantees violating the principles of necessity and proportionality through the way it restricts the rights of the accused and prisoners, the OHCHR concluded.
Finally the OHCHR suggests that changing the law to create impunity for law enforcement officials who use use their weapon in the line of duty need to be reconciled with a respect for human rights. As article 25 is modified to read, law enforcement officials would have immunity from prosecution any time they fired their weapon in the line of duty. The OHCHR points out that this creates a situation of impunity for officials who resort to the arbitrary excessive use of force, perform extrajudicial killings, torture, forced disappearance, and so on. The OHCHR goes on to point out that if they approve this reform, they will be in violation of international treaties and norms to which the government of Honduras is signatory.
So naturally, the National Party is all for said reforms. PAC, PINU and Libre have come out opposing the reforms, and elements of the Liberal Party are split on supporting the package of reforms, with a final vote set for Tuesday.
First the OHCHR is concerned about changes to the definition of terrorism in Article 335 of the Codigo Penal. The changes adds to the paragraph on terrorism:
"Apply the penalties from the preceding article to those who as individuals or as part of a criminal organization of any type, that seeks to assume the powers that belong to the State such as taking territorial control, the monopoly on the legitimate exercise of the use of force by the different institutions of criminal justice, causing fear, putting in grave risk, or systematically and indiscriminately affecting the fundamental rights of the population, or any part of it, the internal security of the State or the economic stability of the country."
For those who haven't been paying attention, every Honduran government since the coup has asserted that protests such as the Torchlight Marches were violating the fundamental rights of the population because protesters blocked the streets. The change in the law criminalizes as terrorism protests against the government. The OHCHR agrees, and suggests that the law make a more narrow definition of terrorism:
"The UN has shown over and over the necessity for the States to limit the application of anti-terrorism measures to the field of acts of authentic terrorism, as specified in the Doctrine, comparing practices in laws, and the Special Relator of the UN for the promotion and protection of human rights and fundamental liberties in the struggle against terrorism in 2010."
The OHCHR also has concerns about the changes to Article 222 of the Penal Code referring to extortion. They point out the new law, as written, strengthens the penalty to 20 years to life in prison. This ignores the Honduran Supreme Court guidance that calls for a penalty that is proportional to the harm caused called for in their review of the proposed law. The Honduran Supreme Court also indicated in their review of this proposed change that it felt that increasing the penalty would not significantly serve as a deterrent to lower the incidence of extortion. Furthermore, the law defines extortion as terrorism, which for the OHCHR is just wrong. Extortion is never, per se, automatically an act of terrorism. Such an equation breaks the spirit and international norms in the struggle against terrorism. It significantly restricts the processual and penal guarantees violating the principles of necessity and proportionality through the way it restricts the rights of the accused and prisoners, the OHCHR concluded.
Finally the OHCHR suggests that changing the law to create impunity for law enforcement officials who use use their weapon in the line of duty need to be reconciled with a respect for human rights. As article 25 is modified to read, law enforcement officials would have immunity from prosecution any time they fired their weapon in the line of duty. The OHCHR points out that this creates a situation of impunity for officials who resort to the arbitrary excessive use of force, perform extrajudicial killings, torture, forced disappearance, and so on. The OHCHR goes on to point out that if they approve this reform, they will be in violation of international treaties and norms to which the government of Honduras is signatory.
So naturally, the National Party is all for said reforms. PAC, PINU and Libre have come out opposing the reforms, and elements of the Liberal Party are split on supporting the package of reforms, with a final vote set for Tuesday.
Indigenous Leader Murdered
An Indigenous leader and pre-school teacher of the Tolupan in Honduras was murdered yesterday by five unnamed attackers in his home in the Montaña de la Flor community of La Ceiba. José de los Santos Sevilla was a son of recently deceased leader Tomas Sevilla.
Sevilla was active in the community in bringing electricity and a hospital to Orica, and in maintaining the Tolupan beliefs. The Mayor of Orica, Rosy Alexander Rodgrigues, said that the La Ceiba band was the most advanced [modernized] of the Tolupan bands of the Montaña de la Flor.
Jose de los Santos Sevilla is the first Tolupan leader from Montaña de la Flor to be murdered according Rodriguez.
The Public Prosecutor's office dispatched a team to investigate the murder.
Sevilla was active in the community in bringing electricity and a hospital to Orica, and in maintaining the Tolupan beliefs. The Mayor of Orica, Rosy Alexander Rodgrigues, said that the La Ceiba band was the most advanced [modernized] of the Tolupan bands of the Montaña de la Flor.
Jose de los Santos Sevilla is the first Tolupan leader from Montaña de la Flor to be murdered according Rodriguez.
The Public Prosecutor's office dispatched a team to investigate the murder.